Proposal 358: unify the circuit handshake extensions
All threads resolved!
All threads resolved!
Before they diverge any further, let's unify the EXT_FIELD_TYPE
s
for CREATE2 and INTRODUCE2 handshakes!
Part of #214.
Merge request reports
Activity
assigned to @nickm
added Project 112 label
requested review from @dgoulet
(CI is failing because I haven't reindexed, because I don't want a conflict with !351 (merged))
- Resolved by David Goulet
This sounds good to me. I'm just wondering here how this ties in prop346 which will negotiate protover version within the ntor-v3 handshake?
Shouldn't we replace all the things with prop346 instead and only negotiate with protover and add extra extensions for aux-data if need be?
added 22 commits
-
d8ef3bd2...08f09290 - 19 commits from branch
tpo/core:main
- e6349a06 - Proposal 358: unify the circuit handshake extensions
- 9b035ad6 - Fix markdown in prop358.
- 5ceccfc8 - reindex.
Toggle commit list-
d8ef3bd2...08f09290 - 19 commits from branch
enabled an automatic merge when all merge checks for 5ceccfc8 pass
mentioned in commit 599d59bb
mentioned in issue #214
Please register or sign in to reply