Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Wiki Replica
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
The Tor Project
TPA
Wiki Replica
Commits
a8961241
Unverified
Commit
a8961241
authored
4 years ago
by
anarcat
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
merge points 5 and 3, outline key points
parent
4f0f6123
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
tsa/howto/conference.mdwn
+13
-15
13 additions, 15 deletions
tsa/howto/conference.mdwn
with
13 additions
and
15 deletions
tsa/howto/conference.mdwn
+
13
−
15
View file @
a8961241
...
...
@@ -119,24 +119,22 @@ Cost estimate summary:
Some observations:
1. Mumble is harder to use and has proven to absolutely require a
headset to function reliably
2. it is assumed that Jitsi and BBB will have similar hardware
requirements. this is based on the experience that BBB seems to
scale better than Jitsi but since it has more features might
require comparatively more resources
3. BBB is marked as having a lesser monthly cost because their
development cycle seems slower than Jitsi. while Jitsi
continuously pushes out updates on multiple components, BBB seems
to do a little slower release schedule.
4. BBB will take much more work to setup. it's more complex than
1. **Mumble is harder to use** and has proven to absolutely **require
a headset** to function reliably
2. it is assumed that **Jitsi and BBB** will have **similar
hardware** requirements. this is based on the experience that BBB
seems to scale better than Jitsi but since it has more features
might require comparatively more resources
3. BBB is marked as having a **lesser monthly cost** because their
development cycle seems slower than Jitsi. that might be **too
optimistic**: we do not actually know how reliable BBB will be in
production. preliminary reports of BBB admins seem to say it's
fairly stable and doesn't require much work after the complex
install procedure
4. BBB will take **much more time to setup**. it's more complex than
Jitsi, but it also requires an Ubuntu, which we do not currently
support in our infrastructure (and an old version too, so upgrade
costs were counted in the setup)
5. that, however, might be optimistic: we do not actually know how
reliable BBB will be in production. preliminary reports of BBB
admins seem to say it's fairly stable and doesn't require much
work after the complex install procedure
6. current TPA situation is that we will be understaffed by 50%
starting on May 1st 2020, and by 75% for two months or more during
the summary. it will not be possible to complete such a project
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment