Enable std::filesystem on libc++ on Windows
tor-browser!829 (closed) could use std::filesystem
to avoid us using Win32 APIs with all their shenanigans.
Currently, we don't have it on Windows because Mozilla used to disable it.
In 116, they had to enable it because of LLVM updates (fstream
now requires std::filesystem
, in LLVM's implementation).
Tom said we can take that change already.
- Show closed items
Activity
-
Newest first Oldest first
-
Show all activity Show comments only Show history only
- Pier Angelo Vendrame added 13.5 stable Build System Next Windows labels
added 13.5 stable Build System Next Windows labels
- Pier Angelo Vendrame assigned to @pierov
assigned to @pierov
- Pier Angelo Vendrame removed Next label
removed Next label
- Pier Angelo Vendrame added Doing label
added Doing label
- Pier Angelo Vendrame mentioned in merge request !851 (merged)
mentioned in merge request !851 (merged)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame added Needs Review label and removed Doing label
added Needs Review label and removed Doing label
- Pier Angelo Vendrame removed Needs Review label
removed Needs Review label
- Pier Angelo Vendrame added Backport Next labels
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #41021 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #41021 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #41022 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #41022 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #41028 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #41028 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #41029 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #41029 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame mentioned in merge request tor-browser!860 (merged)
mentioned in merge request tor-browser!860 (merged)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to tor-browser#42163 (closed)
marked this issue as related to tor-browser#42163 (closed)
- Author Maintainer
@richard since we're not backporting tor-browser!860 (merged), do we still want to Backport this?
It wouldn't be required anymore, but if we took !851 (merged) (this + #41016 (closed)) we would have the same toolchain for 13.0 and 13.5 again (so, consistency).
Collapse replies - Author Maintainer
Consistency, especially if we end up taking #41016 (closed).
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #41033 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #41033 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame marked this issue as related to #41034 (closed)
marked this issue as related to #41034 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame removed the relation with #41028 (closed)
removed the relation with #41028 (closed)
- Pier Angelo Vendrame removed the relation with #41029 (closed)
removed the relation with #41029 (closed)